| The question it answers | What extra will this contract deliver? | What difference are we making, in our own terms? | What is this programme's impact worth against its cost? | Can we prove what the whole organisation did this year? |
|---|
| What it covers | One contract, bid or project | Whatever you choose to look at | One programme and its stakeholders | The whole organisation, for a whole year |
|---|
| What comes out of it | Scored commitments that become contract terms and KPIs | A bespoke report, usually narrative-led | A money value for the impact, and a ratio against cost | A verified annual Social Report |
|---|
| Money value on soft outcomes | Through a framework such as the TOM System | Usually not | Yes — financial proxies are the method | Only where a real financial value exists |
|---|
| Who checks it | The buyer, through contract KPIs | Nobody, unless you commission an evaluator | Optional assurance through Social Value International | A Social Audit Panel chaired by an approved social auditor |
|---|
| Comparable with other organisations | Yes, that is the point of a common framework | No — bespoke metrics do not compare | Rarely — different proxies and assumptions | Against your own previous years, mainly |
|---|
| Realistic if you are small | Unavoidable if you bid for public contracts | Yes, and often the sensible starting point | One or two valued outcomes, not a full analysis | Yes — the method scales down |
|---|